You point at the symptom
Ad spend without conversions, traffic without signups, a number that stopped moving. One line is enough.
Conversion Rate Optimisation Audit
We find the failures your monitoring calls healthy — proven with evidence, ranked by what they cost you.
Book your auditA real example
This one is ours, on our own product — so we can give you the exact numbers rather than a sanitised client story.
Signups had flatlined. A search campaign had spent £140.51 across 136 clicks and produced 2 conversions. Every instinct said the ads were bad or the traffic was weak.
Green. API healthy, every process up, zero server errors across 2,677 requests, empty error logs. Nothing anywhere suggested a fault.
The signup endpoint expected one field as text. The site was sending it as a number. Every visitor arriving with a campaign tag — which is every paid ad click — was rejected at the final step of registration. Deterministically, starting one day after the campaign launched.
The framework logged the rejection without recording which field failed. Visitors without a campaign tag signed up normally, so the funnel looked alive. Found by correlating access logs, email delivery, the user database and ad spend — then reproduced to prove it.
What you get
Every finding arrives with the steps to reproduce it, so you can verify the work rather than take our word for it.
Signup, checkout or enquiry form, tested the way a customer meets it — including from a paid ad click.
We correlate access logs, analytics, ad platform data and your database, because the truth usually sits between them.
No fix ships on a theory. We reproduce the failure first, then prove the fix, then prove nothing next to it broke.
A scary-sounding issue nobody hits ranks below a quiet one costing you every ad click.
So the report is an honest picture, not a scare sheet.
We leave your logging able to name the next failure without us.
How it works
Ad spend without conversions, traffic without signups, a number that stopped moving. One line is enough.
Logs, analytics, spend and code, correlated. We work back from the commercial symptom into the stack.
You get the reproduction steps for every finding, ranked by what it costs you, and a fixed quote to fix them.
After the audit
One-off audits find today's problems. The fault in our example arrived in an ordinary feature deploy — so the useful question is who is watching next Tuesday.
Regular automated checks across your application, conversion funnel, ad spend and infrastructure — testing whether things worked, not merely whether they responded.
Anomalies come to you as a finding with evidence, not another alert to dismiss. Maintenance is included, so what we find gets fixed rather than filed.
What changed, what broke, what we fixed and what to watch. Cancellable on notice — we would rather be kept because the service is good than because leaving is hard.
Built on platforms you already trust
FAQ
Most conversion rate optimisation work tests the things you can see: headlines, button colour, page layout, form length. That is useful, and it assumes the page underneath actually works. We check that assumption. If your form is rejecting a segment of visitors before anything renders, no amount of copy testing will find it.
A code review finds code that looks wrong. A pen test finds what an attacker could do. Neither is designed to find working, well-written code that is quietly costing you money. That is a different search, and it starts from your commercial numbers rather than the codebase.
Then you get a written account of what was checked and found clean, which is a real result if you have been paying for traffic and wondering. We would rather tell you the funnel is sound and the problem is upstream than invent findings to justify the fee.
We need read access to logs and analytics, and ideally the codebase. We can work from exports if your security policy requires it. Nothing is changed without your say-so, and remediation is quoted separately so an audit never turns into an open-ended bill.
Yes, as a separate quoted piece of work. Fixes are applied on a branch, verified in production with before-and-after evidence, and we add the tests or logging that would have caught the problem earlier.
Because most monitoring answers "did the server respond?" rather than "did it respond correctly?". A validation rejection is a perfectly normal, successful HTTP response as far as uptime tooling is concerned. On our own product this exact gap hid a fault that blocked every paid ad click for six weeks.
Book your audit
A dashboard, or a customer? If it was a customer, that is the gap this audit closes. Send one line about the number that stopped moving.
0330 043 7414 · hello@nerdster.ai · Mon–Fri 9–5:30
Tell us which number stopped moving and we'll come back within one working day.
A consultant will reply within one working day. Prefer to speak now? Call 0330 043 7414.